[Java]Add Support for DateTime, Array, Tuple, Float32, Float64 in ClickHouseIO parseDefaultExpression (#33692) - #36059
[Java]Add Support for DateTime, Array, Tuple, Float32, Float64 in ClickHouseIO parseDefaultExpression (#33692)#36059Suvrat1629 wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Suvrat1629, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly expands the data type handling capabilities within the ClickHouseIO connector. It enables the parseDefaultExpression method to correctly interpret and process default values for several complex and common data types, thereby improving the robustness and compatibility of data ingestion and processing with Beam schemas.
Highlights
- New Data Type Support: Added support for DateTime, Array, Tuple, Float32, and Float64 in TableSchema.parseDefaultExpression for ClickHouseIO.
- Recursive Parsing: Implemented recursive parsing logic for Array and Tuple types to correctly handle nested structures.
- Beam Schema Compatibility: Enhanced parsing ensures better compatibility with Beam schemas for the newly supported data types.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
|
Assigning reviewers: R: @Abacn for label java. Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
|
@Abacn gentle ping could you please take a look at this. |
Abacn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for working on this. Left a few comments. cc: @BentsiLeviav
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid DateTime/Date format: " + value, e); | ||
| } | ||
| case ARRAY: | ||
| // ClickHouse Array format: '[1,2,3]' or '["a","b"]' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if we can use a third party lib to parse array, or there is any tool within clickhouse library supporting this. This sounds fragile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think perhaps @BentsiLeviav could help with something as I myself do not have much experience with Clickhouse.
|
Hi folks First, @Suvrat1629 , huge thanks for the contribution. I needed to be more specific and detailed in #33692, my apologies. As of today, this is the existing behavior:
Is there any other place we use this?Yes. The original idea behind #33692 was not only to add these types, but also to solve/decouple the tension between the different needs (the first need is to evaluate defaults, the second is to evaluate primitive values). As I commented here #33692 (comment), we plan to upgrade the ClickHouse client, support the use of Suggested implementation in this PRThe main issue with the existing implementation (that is being extended with this PR) is that in case users use none primitive default values (which is usually the case), the entire pipe will collapse. For instance, given the following target table: CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE test
(
id UInt64,
updated_at DateTime DEFAULT now(),
updated_at_date Date DEFAULT toDate(updated_at)
)
ENGINE = MergeTree
ORDER BY id;The
and the entire pipe will get broken (the code will try to create a DateTime object of the string So to conclude, the right solution for this problem would be to implement support for the @Suvrat1629 I really appreciate the time and effort you put into this, and my apologies for not being more detailed abou this in the original issue. CC @Abacn |
|
@BentsiLeviav Thanks for the response In
|
|
Hi @Suvrat1629, After discussing internally, I need to share some important context:
This means implementing the current approach would create code we'd immediately need to remove. Given that we plan to start the V2 migration refactor in the near future, it would be more efficient for us to address this issue as part of that comprehensive update rather than implementing a temporary solution now. I really appreciate your enthusiasm and the time you've invested in understanding this issue. Would you be interested in picking up a different issue that won't be affected by the upcoming refactor? In addition, did you implement this due to limitations you have with ClickHouse and Beam related to default values? If so, can you share more about your use case and about the issues you encounter in your pipeline? |
|
@BentsiLeviav Ok sure I just picked up the issue because I thought I had found a fix for this but if you plan on implementing a fix for it yourself I am ok closing this pr :) |

Please add a meaningful description for your change here
This PR fixes #33692 by adding support for
DateTime,Array,Tuple,Float32, andFloat64inTableSchema.parseDefaultExpressionforClickHouseIO. The method now parses default expressions for these types, with recursive handling forArrayandTuple, ensuring compatibility with Beam schemas.Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.